| kwantice | What would be the first thing you would say to kerry katona if you were stranded together on a remote pacific island? I would say "I am never going to have sex with you". [www.dailymail.co.uk] |
 | Forum home · New thread · Search · Log in |
Forum // Desert island Dis..katona style
| vinylvandal | if you go by the stereotypes associated with people who post on internet message boards about electronic music then none of us would stand a chance with any woman  |
| Japes | Just read that 'article'. Still not clued up as to who she is (obviously I've heard the name, but never thought to find out who she is). However, three things strike me: 1) The writer keeps insisting that she is 'curvy'. It is dressed up as being congratulatory but it's clearly patronising. "Aren't you doing well, with your new man and your natural curves." Presumably she's had body issues in the past? I can't see how continuing to focus on women's weight fluctuations help the person in question, or women in general. And this ostensibly caring tone isn't consistent with the Mail's notorious Sidebar Of Shame. Also, she just looks like a normal sized woman to me. If you asked me what her build was, I wouldn't say curvy. I'd say 'normal' probably. Wait! Are they talking about her tits? They're talking about her tits, aren't they? Woohoo! HOLD THE FRONT PAGE BOYS! 2) The writer refers to this Steve guy as an artist. I see no evidence of this:  3) If I was washed up on a desert island with her, as I have no prior knowledge of who she is, I'd try to get along with her. Obviously animal instincts would take over after a few weeks and I'd either (consentually) fuck her or (non-consentually) eat her. So then I'd either be stranded on an island alone, driven mad after having comitted murder and cannibalism, or I'd be stranded on an island with Kerry Katona and the product of our sexual congress. The prospects are bleak. Are these the answers you were after, Kwantice? |
| kwantice | Japes said: adroit analysis japes.Just read that 'article'. Still not clued up as to who she is (obviously I've heard the name, but never thought to find out who she is). However, three things strike me: 1) The writer keeps insisting that she is 'curvy'. It is dressed up as being congratulatory but it's clearly patronising. "Aren't you doing well, with your new man and your natural curves." Presumably she's had body issues in the past? I can't see how continuing to focus on women's weight fluctuations help the person in question, or women in general. And this ostensibly caring tone isn't consistent with the Mail's notorious Sidebar Of Shame. Also, she just looks like a normal sized woman to me. If you asked me what her build was, I wouldn't say curvy. I'd say 'normal' probably. Wait! Are they talking about her tits? They're talking about her tits, aren't they? Woohoo! HOLD THE FRONT PAGE BOYS! 2) The writer refers to this Steve guy as an artist. I see no evidence of this: 3) If I was washed up on a desert island with her, as I have no prior knowledge of who she is, I'd try to get along with her. Obviously animal instincts would take over after a few weeks and I'd either (consentually) fuck her or (non-consentually) eat her. So then I'd either be stranded on an island alone, driven mad after having comitted murder and cannibalism, or I'd be stranded on an island with Kerry Katona and the product of our sexual congress. The prospects are bleak. Are these the answers you were after, Kwantice? |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.